Constitutions as Risk Management Devices: The Case of Secession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1974-4935/7513Keywords:
Secession, Comparative, Constitutional Law, Constitutions, Fear,Abstract
This short essay explores the importance of fear and violence in the genesis and life of constitutions, with a particular focus on the case of secession. Secession has been seen as a taboo (Mancini) and until recently constitutions tried to avoid mentioning it, considering such a phenomenon as an extra legal fact. A turning point has been represented by the famous Reference of the Canadian Supreme Court on Québec.
Finally, in the last part of this work I shall try to present some arguments in favour of the explicit constitutionalization of a secession clause in multi-national federalisms.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Giuseppe Martinico
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Once the paper proposal is accepted, authors must send to the editorial team the release form, filled and signed, available at http://www.sba.unibo.it/it/almadl/servizi-almadl/pubblicare-riviste-scientifiche-di-qualita, clicking on “Richiesta di autorizzazione e liberatoria per la pubblicazione di contributi singoli in opere collettive” and downloading the appropriate file